Skip to main content
· 12/21/2012

Buku Properties v. Raoel H. Clark

Citations

  • 153 Idaho 828
  • 291 P.3d 1027
  • 2012 Ida. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Only when a document is ambiguous is parol evidence admissible to discover the drafter’s intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burdick, Eismann, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.