Skip to main content
· 4/4/1980

Bukhari v. Hutto

Citations

  • 487 F. Supp. 1162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying intermediate scrutiny in case involving differences between men’s and women’s prisons
  • rejecting a claim that “oppressive boredom” violated the Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merhige

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.