· 4/4/1980
Bukhari v. Hutto
Citations
- 487 F. Supp. 1162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying intermediate scrutiny in case involving differences between men’s and women’s prisons
- rejecting a claim that “oppressive boredom” violated the Constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merhige
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.