Buisson v. McNeil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a physical intrusion into a property is a search under the Fourth Amendment
• observing that “[situations involving merely the transmission of electronic signals without trespass would remain subject to Katz analysis”
• explaining that a search occurs where there is a “[trespass ... conjoined with that what was present here: an attempt to find something or to obtain information”
• explaining that a search occurs where there is a “[t]respass . . . conjoined with that what was present here: an attempt to find something or to obtain information”
• recognizing a GPS tracking, device can effect a “search” within the Fourth Amendment
• declining to address government’s alternative argument that the search was reasonable because that issue was not preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).