Skip to main content
· 1/17/2007

Building Innovation Industries, L.L.C. v. Onken

Citations

  • 473 F. Supp. 2d 978
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3833
  • 2007 WL 158737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing this circumstance as a “closer question” with regards to the applicability of § 285
  • noting that A.R.S. § 12–341.01(A) is “is substantive in nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.