Building Industry Ass'n of Superior California v. Norton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that the “studies the Service relied on were imperfect ... alone is insufficient to undermine those authorities’ status as the ‘best scientific ... data available’ ”
• holding that the fact that the “studies the Service relied on were imperfect . . . alone is insufficient to undermine those authorities’ status as the ‘best scientific . . . data available’”
• holding that the fact that the “studies the Service relied on were imperfect . . . alone is insufficient to undermine those authorities’ status as the ‘best scientific . . . data available’”
• “[T]he [NMFS must] utilize the best scientific data available, not the best scientific data possible.”
• “[T]he [NMFS must] utilize the best scientific data available, not the best scientific data possible.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis in original)
• “the Service must utilize the ‘best scientific data available,’ not the best scientific data possible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).