Skip to main content
· 4/21/1992

Building & Construction Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor

Citations

  • 961 F.2d 269
  • 295 U.S. App. D.C. 182
  • 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1430
  • 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,313
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7281
  • 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 35,628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “legislative history can only help to explain a statute; it cannot reconstruct it”
  • “[A] provision contained in an appropriations bill operates only in the applicable fiscal year, unless its language clearly indicates that it is intended to be permanent”
  • “[T]he Secretary of Labor’s statutory authority does not require task-oriented definitions [of helpers].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.