Skip to main content
· 5/12/2009

Buhring v. Tavoletti

Citations

  • 905 N.E.2d 1059
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 807
  • 2009 WL 1330804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remanding for a new trial, because misleading or incorrect statements of law had a significant likelihood of impacting the outcome of the case
  • reversing and remanding for a new trial, because misleading or incorrect statements of law had a significant likelihood of impacting the outcome of the case
  • defendant’s burden to establish affirmative defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Crone, Bradford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.