Skip to main content
· 10/26/1992

Buhl v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.

Citations

  • 840 S.W.2d 904
  • 1992 Tenn. LEXIS 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • placement of fiber-optic line was beyond scope of railroad easement because it had only a nonrailroad commercial purpose
  • where the deed limited the purpose of the easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reid, Drowota, O'Brien, Anderson, Daughtrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.