Buhl v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• placement of fiber-optic line was beyond scope of railroad easement because it had only a nonrailroad commercial purpose
• where the deed limited the purpose of the easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 329×
• Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. Krohn
  Texas Supreme Court· 2002-11-05· cited 315×
• John H. Isaacs v. Sprint Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-08-14· cited 49×
• In Re WorldCom, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2006-07-26· cited 45×
• Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1997-04-07· cited 22×
• Hallaba v. Worldcom Network Services Inc.
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2000-03-31· cited 22×
• Thomas v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-08-29· cited 15×
• South Central Tennessee Railroad Authority v. Harakas
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-08-09· cited 12×
• Smith v. Sprint Communications Company
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-10-19· cited 11×
• Smith v. Sprint Communications Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-10-19· cited 11×
• Gipson v. Sprint Communications Co.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-05-15· cited 8×
• Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-25· cited 6×
• Hynek v. MCI World Communications, Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 2002-05-20· cited 6×
• Canova v. Shell Pipeline Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 2002-05-07· cited 4×
• KT Group, LLC v. Robert Lowe
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2018-10-19· cited 2×
• American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Proffitt
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-03-30· cited 1×
• Simon v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-03-03· cited 1×
• Isaacs, John H. v. Sprint Corp
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-08-14
• Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P. v. Saratoga Timber Co., Ltd., Batson Corridor, L.P., and Timbervest Partners Texas, L.P.
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-01-15

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Railway Co. v. Telford's Executors
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1890-10-30· cited 29×
• Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Bell
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1931-06-11· cited 26×
• Home Telephone Co. v. People's Telephone & Telegraph Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1911-09-15· cited 20×
• Farrar v. N. C. & St. L. Ry.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1931-03-14· cited 14×
• Railroad v. Telegraph Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1898-04-16· cited 14×
• City of Knoxville v. Kaiser
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1930-12-15· cited 6×
• Lillard v. Southern Railway Company
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1959-12-11· cited 5×
• Smoky Mountain Railroad v. Paine Oil Co.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1972-12-29· cited 5×
• Pemberton v. Southern Railway Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1931-01-19· cited 4×
• Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Nashville, C. & St. L., Ry. Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1921-04-15· cited 3×