· 10/26/1992
Buhl v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.
Citations
- 840 S.W.2d 904
- 1992 Tenn. LEXIS 574
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- placement of fiber-optic line was beyond scope of railroad easement because it had only a nonrailroad commercial purpose
- where the deed limited the purpose of the easement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reid, Drowota, O'Brien, Anderson, Daughtrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.