Bugg v. Bugg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]here it is determined that the parties intended not to be bound until the written contract is executed, no valid and enforceable obligation will be held to arise”
• “Where it is determined that the parties intended not to be bound until the witten contract is executed, no valid and enforceable obligation will be held to arise.”
• “Where it is determined that the parties intended not to be bound until the written contract is executed, no valid and enforceable obligation will be held to arise.”
• the absence of finality of a property settlement agreement held shown by a husband’s letter that stated he would pay lump sum alimony provided in the proposed agreement “ ‘as soon as the agreement [was] entered into’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Electro-Lab of Aiken, Inc. v. Sharp Construction Co. of Sumter, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-02-02· cited 34×
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 1988-05-05· cited 17×
• Small v. Small
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-07-01· cited 6×
• Columbia Management Corp. v. Resort Properties, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-09-14· cited 5×
• Liles v. Liles
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-02-27· cited 4×
• Reed v. Boykin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-12-10· cited 3×
• Fender & Latham, Inc. v. First Union National Bank
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-06-20· cited 3×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Jones
  Fourth Circuit· 1988-05-05· cited 1×