Skip to main content
· 1/18/1894

Buford v. North Roanoke Land & Imp. Co.

Citations

  • 90 Va. 418
  • 18 S.E. 914
  • 1894 Va. LEXIS 9

Syllabus

<p>1. Deed — Construction—After-born child — Case at bar. — -Conveyance of land to '‘the lawful heirs of J. and B.,” who were then living and had three children, and a fourth child was born to them after date of deed: held, the deed gave a fee in remainder to three children to be opened for the fourth child when born.</p> <p>2. Married Women — Adverse possession — Case at bar. — It appearing that the four children held jointly, adversary possession of the land until 1843, when the fourth child was under the disability of coverture and remained such till after 1881: held, there could be no adversary possession against her in favor of her co-tenants during her coverture.</p> <p>3. Chancery Practice — Answer—Case at bar. — Code, section 3275, allows defendant to file his answer any time before final decree. In the case here, ten days after the rendition, by default, of a decree final in form, the defendants, during the same term, presented their answer to the bill, showing a probable title to the land in question; but the court below refused to allow the answer to be filed solely on the ground that it “ was presented too late.”</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>The ruling was error.</p> <p>4. Cases Compared. — G-erstv. Jones, 32 Gratt., 528, distinguished from the case here.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that neither the court’s order of June 12 nor the docket entry describing that order “evince[d] clearly an intent to make a judgment on those days”
  • disposition ambiguous as to intent where stated judgment \to be entered\ and hence did not denote current operation
  • disposition ambiguous as to intent where stated judgment “to be entered” and hence did not denote current operation
  • “It is settled that there is no judgment until the clerk makes his docket entry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fauntleroy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.