Buford v. Hickman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “presumptive taint” test for mere technical violations of Article 31
• An unwarned, voluntary statement does not presumptively taint a later, warned statement. The decisive point is whether the later statement was voluntary.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).