Bufkin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that citizenship is equivalent to domicile, and that domicile requires both “residence in a state and an intention to remain there indefinitely.”
• noting that “domicile requires both residence in a state and an intention to remain there indefinitely”
• noting that “domicile requires both residence in a state and an intention to remain there indefinitely”
• stating that the allegations of citizenship in a complaint “are fatally defective” because “[r]esidence alone is not enough”
• explaining that citizenship is equivalent to domicile, which requires both residence and intention to remain indefinitely
• stating that domicile requires both residence in a state and an intention to remain there indefinitely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).