Third Circuit· 7/28/1965
Buffington v. Wood
Citations
- 351 F.2d 292
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting “technical” interpretation of Rule 35(b) in favor of flexible approach designed “to facilitate medical report exchange”
- “Having determined that there are methods other than Rule 35(b)(1) which may be used to facilitate an exchange of medical reports, we now consider whether Federal Rule 16 is one of these alternative approaches under the circumstances of this case.”
- “The directive of the Federal Rules to eliminate surprise from litigation demands that we construe them reasonably to facilitate this goal and maximize pre-trial exchange of materials.”
- district court had power to compel full disclosure by exchange of medical reports
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Admiral Theatre Corp. v. Douglas Theatre Co.Eighth Circuit· 1978-10-18· cited 128×
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District of Columbia· 1978-10-18· cited 63×
- García Negrón v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1976-03-31· cited 40×
- White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1984-02-07· cited 22×
- Identiseal Corporation of Wisconsin, a Wisconsin Corporation, Plaintiff v. Positive Identification Systems, Incorporated, a Texas CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1977-08-19· cited 17×
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.N.D. Ohio· 1980-03-08· cited 17×
- Otero Prann v. Delbrey RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1998-01-22· cited 16×
- Hikel v. AbousyD. Maryland· 1966-09-27· cited 13×
- Robert Lassiter v. City of PhiladelphiaThird Circuit· 2013-05-15· cited 10×
- Kotes v. Super Fresh Food Markets, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-07-28· cited 8×
- Admiral Theatre Corporation v. The Douglas Theatre CompanyEighth Circuit· 1978-10-18· cited 1×
- Buffington v. WoodThird Circuit· 1965-10-15
- Thompson v. E. R. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Delaware· 1968-04-24
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 14,398×
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,194×
- Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Thompson Mahogany Company (Third-Party Defendant)Third Circuit· 1961-06-20· cited 80×
- Sher v. De HavenD.C. Circuit· 1952-12-17· cited 63×
- William Link v. Wabash Railroad CompanySeventh Circuit· 1961-06-29· cited 51×
- O'MALLEY v. Chrysler CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1947-02-19· cited 29×
- Leszynski v. RussD. Maryland· 1961-11-09· cited 16×
- Galloway v. National Dairy Products Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1959-09-03· cited 5×
Other cases named Buffington v. Wood
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.