Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 7/28/1965

Buffington v. Wood

Citations

  • 351 F.2d 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting “technical” interpretation of Rule 35(b) in favor of flexible approach designed “to facilitate medical report exchange”
  • “Having determined that there are methods other than Rule 35(b)(1) which may be used to facilitate an exchange of medical reports, we now consider whether Federal Rule 16 is one of these alternative approaches under the circumstances of this case.”
  • “The directive of the Federal Rules to eliminate surprise from litigation demands that we construe them reasonably to facilitate this goal and maximize pre-trial exchange of materials.”
  • district court had power to compel full disclosure by exchange of medical reports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Buffington v. Wood

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.