Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 5/7/2009
Buffalo v. Buffalo
Citations
- 2009 OK CIV APP 44
- 211 P.3d 923
- 2009 WL 1280213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- preference should be \for good reasons and well supported by the facts\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joplin, Mitchell, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1986-06-10· cited 182×
- Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2001-12-18· cited 98×
- Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1968-05-21· cited 93×
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2001-11-27· cited 40×
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2001-05-14· cited 34×
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1960-09-21· cited 22×
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1963-01-22· cited 18×
- Ness v. NessSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1960-12-20· cited 17×
- Nazworth v. NazworthCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-11-19· cited 17×
- Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1969-01-14· cited 15×
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-12-23· cited 10×
- Matter of Estate of BoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1975-10-07· cited 8×
- Hogue v. HogueCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2008-04-18· cited 7×
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.