Buffalo Ranch Co., Ltd. v. Thomason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that deed language reserving mineral interest was not ambiguous because it could be “accorded a certain legal meaning by applying appropriate rules of construction”
• concluding that deed language reserving mineral interest was not ambiguous because it could be “accorded a certain legal meaning by applying appropriate rules of construction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).