Buffalo Lubricating Oil Co. v. Acme Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Sherman Act “can properly confer personal jurisdiction over a defendant” only where the action is brought in “the district where ,.. venue lies.”
• holding that § 1406(a) “permits courts to transfer in the interest of justice whenever either personal jurisdiction or venue are improper’
• concluding that Section 12 of the Clayton Act “can properly confer personal jurisdiction over a defendant only . . . where Section 12 venue lies”
• concluding that physician-plaintiffs seeking to join cartel were not efficient enforcers of antitrust laws
• holding that Section 1391(b)(2) contemplates that venue can be appropriate in more than one district so long as a substantial part of the relevant events took place in each of those districts
• holding that a defendant “resides” only in its place of domicile for venue purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).