Buffalo Insurance v. Star Photo Finishing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• that plaintiff misplaced the policy did not excuse it from complying with 60-day proof of loss requirement
• “ ‘demand for payment . . . must be made at a time when a demand for immediate payment is in order’ ”
• that an insured -- though its own negligence -- lost or misplaced the insurance policy was insufficient to excuse the insured’s non-compliance with the policy’s notice provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).