Buffalo Broadcasting Co. v. Correctional Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that BIA may not consider new social groups raised for the first time on appeal
• holding that we generally will not consider an argument that could have been, but was not, raised before the Immigration Judge
• holding that BIA 2 “review[s] the ultimate determination whether a proposed group is cognizable de 3 novo,” but “review[s] an [IJ]’s factual findings underlying that determination for 4 clear error”
• noting that a petitioner must delineate his or her proposed social group before the IJ, and may not reframe the group on appeal
• stating that the Board “generally will not consider an argument or claim that could have been, but was not, advanced before the Immigration Judge”
• noting that Board has long held that it will generally not consider arguments or claims that could have, but were not, raised before the IJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).