Buffalo Bills, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that drunk-driving defendant’s medical records were protected by physician-patient privilege under R.C. 2317.02 and “there is no vacuum within which we can proceed by common-law pronouncement”
• court is not free to propose amendment to rule that would deny privilege in drunk-driving eases
• “Judicial policy preferences may not be used to override valid legislative enactments, for the General Assembly should be the final arbiter of public policy.”
• the legislature's valid laws control policy preferences
• blood test results constituted communication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).