Skip to main content
· 2/5/1992

Buetow v. State

Citations

  • 44 Ill. Ct. Cl. 93
  • 1992 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Affording the BOP’s Program Statement the deference it is due, we cannot declare it invalid on the basis of the challenge lodged against it by Shahid.” (quoting Rios, 201 F.3d at 275)
  • “Affording the BOP’s Program Statement the deference it is due, we cannot declare it invalid on the basis of the challenge lodged against it by Shahid.” (quoting Rios, 201 F.3d at 275)
  • “Affording the BOP’s Program Statement the deference it is due, we cannot declare it invalid on the basis of the challenge lodged against it by Shahid.” (quoting Rios, 201 F.3d at 275)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.