Skip to main content
· 10/17/2002

Bueter v. Brinkman

Citations

  • 776 N.E.2d 910
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1695
  • 2002 WL 31323280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a final judgment is one that puts an end to the particular case and reserves no further question for future determination
  • appellate court does not have jurisdiction over appeal because appealed order was not a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order
  • appellate court did not have jurisdiction because appealed order was not a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order
  • lack of appellate jurisdiction pursuant to App. R. 5 results in dismissal of appeal
  • a final judgment is one that “disposes of all issues as to all parties, to the full extent of the court to dispose of the same, and puts an end to the particular case” and “reserves no further question or direction for future determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Riley, Mattingly-May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.