Bueno v. Workman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an appellate court cannot use the tipsy coachman rule where the trial court has not made factual findings
• tipsy coachman rule inapplicable “where a lower court has not made factual findings on an issue”
• an appellate court cannot employ the “right for the wrong reason” doctrine where the circuit court has not made necessary factual findings on an issue
• elements of waiver are: existence of a right which may be waived; actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and intent to relinquish the right
• \[A]n appellate court cannot employ the tipsy coachman rule where a lower court has not made factual findings on an issue.\
• judicial estoppel prevents litigants who have successfully maintained a position in one proceeding from taking an inconsistent position in a later proceeding in which the same parties and questions are involved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).