Bueno v. State
Citations
- 40 Fla. 160
Syllabus
<p>1. A conviction in the municipal court of a city based upon a city ordinance creating an offense against the city is no bar to a State prosecution for the same acts which under a State statute constitute an offense against the State.</p> <p>2. Where an information charges only one offense, but in its several counts charges that offense to have been committed in different ways or by different methods, and there is a general verdict of guilty followed by a general sentence within the limits prescribed for the offense, any error in refusing to quash particular bad counts in the information is harmless, where the information contains good counts which are fully sustained by the evidence.</p> <p>3. A count charging that defendant, in Monroe county on August ■21, 1897, “unlawfully and feloniously did set up and promote a certain lottery, which said lottery was then and there for money, and which said lottery is commonly known as ‘bolito,’ a more particular description of which said lottery is to the solicitor aforesaid unknown,” and another in the same language except the words “and promote” are omitted, are good under Section 1, Chapter 4373, Acts of 1895.</p> <p>4. Counts in an information framed under Section 1, Chapter 4373, Acts of 1895, charging that defendant in a specified county, at a specified time, “unlawfully and feloniously did sell to one Jeremiah Cleare a certain lottery ticket,” and ‘“unlawfully and feloniously did sell to Jeremiah Cleare a fractional part of a lottery ticket,” and “unlawfully and feloniously did sell to Jeremiah Cleare a share in a lottery ticket,” are sufficient without designating the particular lottery ticket, or specifying the fractional part or share in the lottery ticket alleged to have been sold.</p> <p>5. -Instructions that are not applicable to any eivdence in the case are properly refused.</p> <p>6. Slips of paper stamped by the seller and sold at five cents each to purchasers who number them with certain numbers selected by
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BooneSupreme Court of Florida· 1970-04-22· cited 50×
- Mixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-08-28· cited 44×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-10-26· cited 24×
- Synes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-07-29· cited 20×
- Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-01-15· cited 16×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 16×
- Horner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-02-12· cited 14×
- Poyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-05-14· cited 12×
- Norwood v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-07-23· cited 10×
- Bullard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-03-19· cited 9×
- State v. ButlerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-02-18· cited 7×
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-09-29· cited 6×
- Deal v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-12-07· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court· 1846-05-15· cited 61×
- Thelsen v. McDavidSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 52×
- Hunt v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 51×
- Freleigh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1844-07-15· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-02-28· cited 33×
- Dunn v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1866-04-15· cited 28×
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1886-06-15· cited 19×
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-06-15· cited 18×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-06-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.