Buell v. Hughes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a plaintiff’s responses did not comply with Local Rule 56(a)2 where they stated that “Plaintiffs lack sufficient information to agree or disagree,” and accordingly deeming those paragraphs admitted
• facts deemed admitted where Rule 56(a)(2) Statement merely indicated that plaintiffs lacked sufficient information to admit or deny a fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).