· 3/17/1927
Buell v. Hoffman
Citations
- 17 F.2d 925
- 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that decision regarding whether a claim is barred by claim preclusion is reviewed de novo
- explaining that decision regarding whether a claim is barred by claim preclusion is reviewed de novo
- explaining that California’s res judicata and collateral estoppel principles apply where underlying judgment was rendered in state court, and setting forth elements of collateral estop-pel under California law
- collateral estoppel applies where issues at stake were actually litigated by a party against whom preclusion is asserted and were necessary to the earlier judgment
- setting forth elements of collateral estoppel under California law
- dismissal based on collatéral estoppel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alschuler, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.