Skip to main content
· 3/17/1927

Buell v. Hoffman

Citations

  • 17 F.2d 925
  • 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that decision regarding whether a claim is barred by claim preclusion is reviewed de novo
  • explaining that decision regarding whether a claim is barred by claim preclusion is reviewed de novo
  • explaining that California’s res judicata and collateral estoppel principles apply where underlying judgment was rendered in state court, and setting forth elements of collateral estop-pel under California law
  • collateral estoppel applies where issues at stake were actually litigated by a party against whom preclusion is asserted and were necessary to the earlier judgment
  • setting forth elements of collateral estoppel under California law
  • dismissal based on collatéral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alschuler, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.