Skip to main content
· 9/27/1984

Buehl v. Dayson

Citations

  • 469 N.E.2d 403
  • 127 Ill. App. 3d 958
  • 82 Ill. Dec. 869
  • 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 2366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[The] purpose [of the provision] is to prevent purchasers, who have sufficient knowledge of the remedy available to them, from waiting the entire three year statute of limitations to decide whether to elect rescission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Welch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.