Skip to main content

Buechel v. Bain

Citations

  • 766 N.E.2d 914
  • 97 N.Y.2d 295
  • 740 N.Y.S.2d 252
  • 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing “case- by-case analysis” and “the nature of the proceedings” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “[P]rivity is an amorphous concept not easy of application . . . .” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “In the context of collateral estoppel, . . . privity . . . includes those . . . whose interests are represented by a party to the action” (citation omitted)
  • “Collateral estoppel precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

307 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Buechel v. Bain

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.