· 11/5/1959
Budowanec v. Gaydos
Citations
- 162 N.E.2d 198
- 110 Ohio App. 357
- 84 Ohio Law. Abs. 239
- 13 Ohio Op. 2d 120
- 1959 Ohio App. LEXIS 759
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that when a defendant does not object to a “magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, we review any challenge to the district court’s factual findings for plain error”
- explaining that when a defendant does not object to a “magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, we review any challenge to the district court’s factual findings for plain error”
- “Abandonment is determined based on the objective facts available to the investigating officers at the time they conducted the challenged search.” (emphasis added)
- “But we need not determine whether the entry was lawful[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Skeel, Hurd, Kovachy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.