Buddhist Church of San Francisco v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the decision by a bowling association to disqualify bowlers would not be disturbed absent a showing of “arbitrariness, fraud, or collusion” or that the bowlers were not afforded procedural due process
• noting that the dispute “concerns the jurisdictional requirements for judicial review of the decision of a voluntary association”
• concluding that the decision by a bowling association to disqualify bowlers would not be disturbed unless the association did not afford the contestants due process or there was a showing of “arbitrariness, fraud, or collusion” on the part of the association
• affirming the voluntary association's disqualification of a bowling team because the team failed to allege evidence indicating the decision was the result of arbitrariness, fraud, or collusion because this standard, though not officially state law, was the common law
• affirming the voluntary association’s disqualification of a bowling team because the team failed to allege evidence indicating the decision was the result of arbitrariness, fraud, or collusion because this standard, though not officially state law, was the common law
• The action of a board is final and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of arbitrariness, fraud, or collusion or \a procedural scheme which is not in accord with due process.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).