Skip to main content
· 1/16/1980

Budahl v. Gordon & David Associates

Citations

  • 287 N.W.2d 489
  • 1980 S.D. LEXIS 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We believe we follow the weight of authority in saying that the [60 day statute] does bear a rational relationship to the legislation's purpose\
  • claim for loss of consortium “depends on the validity of the main claim”
  • opportunity to investigate while evidence is fresh, prepare defense, evaluate merits of claim, protect against nuisance claims, facilitate prompt repairs, allow for budgeting of claims, and ensure officials are aware of duty to act are all proper reasons for increased protec tion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.