· 1/16/1980
Budahl v. Gordon & David Associates
Citations
- 287 N.W.2d 489
- 1980 S.D. LEXIS 241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We believe we follow the weight of authority in saying that the [60 day statute] does bear a rational relationship to the legislation's purpose\
- claim for loss of consortium “depends on the validity of the main claim”
- opportunity to investigate while evidence is fresh, prepare defense, evaluate merits of claim, protect against nuisance claims, facilitate prompt repairs, allow for budgeting of claims, and ensure officials are aware of duty to act are all proper reasons for increased protec tion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.