· 3/20/1969
Bucks County Bank and Trust Company v. Storck
Citations
- 297 F. Supp. 1122
- 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony by client at hearing on motion for return of property taken by allegedly illegal search and seizure does not constitute general waiver of attorney-client privilege and cannot be used “in the criminal case in chief”
- testimony by client at hearing on motion for return of property taken by allegedly illegal search and seizure does not constitute general waiver of attorney-client privilege and cannot be used \in the criminal case in chief\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tavares
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.