Skip to main content
· 3/20/1969

Bucks County Bank and Trust Company v. Storck

Citations

  • 297 F. Supp. 1122
  • 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony by client at hearing on motion for return of property taken by allegedly illegal search and seizure does not constitute general waiver of attorney-client privilege and cannot be used “in the criminal case in chief”
  • testimony by client at hearing on motion for return of property taken by allegedly illegal search and seizure does not constitute general waiver of attorney-client privilege and cannot be used \in the criminal case in chief\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tavares

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.