Buckner v. Hassell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court excluded expert’s testimony because plaintiff had failed to disclose that physician would be offered as expert on the issue of standard of care
• appellate courts should let discretionary decision stand if reasonable minds can differ about its soundness
• “With respect to the Trial Court’s exclusion of Dr. Googe’s testimony, we find that this matter is not properly before this Court. Plaintiff failed to raise this issue in her Motion for New Trial, and as a result, waived this issue for purposes of appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).