Skip to main content
· 11/15/1874

Buckner & Co. v. Davis

Citations

  • 29 Ark. 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs claim regarding the VA’s decision not to recoup his special separation benefit from his disability compensation was beyond the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims
  • dismissing portion of pro se complaint where plaintiff, in his reply brief, “appear[ed] to concede that this court is not the proper forum” and “request[ed] [that] the Court dismiss[] that portion of the [claim]” (some alterations in original)
  • dismissing portion of pro se complaint where plaintiff, in his reply brief, “appear[ed] to concede that this court is not the proper forum” and “request[ed] [that] the Court dismiss[] that portion of the [claim]” (some alterations in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.