· 11/15/1874
Buckner & Co. v. Davis
Citations
- 29 Ark. 444
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiffs claim regarding the VA’s decision not to recoup his special separation benefit from his disability compensation was beyond the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims
- dismissing portion of pro se complaint where plaintiff, in his reply brief, “appear[ed] to concede that this court is not the proper forum” and “request[ed] [that] the Court dismiss[] that portion of the [claim]” (some alterations in original)
- dismissing portion of pro se complaint where plaintiff, in his reply brief, “appear[ed] to concede that this court is not the proper forum” and “request[ed] [that] the Court dismiss[] that portion of the [claim]” (some alterations in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.