Buckmaster v. Director of Patuxent Institution

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert testimony based on a report prepared by non-testifying forensic analysts violated defendant’s confrontation rights
• discussing numerous confrontation clause cases involving forensic reports and holding that statements in analyst’s report of glucose tests requested by medical examiner were testimonial
• discussing numerous confrontation clause cases involving forensic reports and holding that statements in analyst's report of glucose tests requested by medical examiner were testimonial
• explaining the harmless error standard for constitutional errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).