· 6/2/2008
Buckley v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)
Citations
- 388 B.R. 115
- 60 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 331
- 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2047
- 2008 WL 2264251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing Young v. Rose (In re Rose), 86 B.R. 86 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1988)
- “When § 1328(a)(4) is interpreted within the overall grammatical structure of § 1328(a
- “When § 1328(a)(4) is interpreted within the overall grammatical structure of § 1328(a) it is plain that the statute does not intend to differentiate between a judgment entered before and one entered after a bankruptcy petition is filed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mary D. France
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.