Skip to main content
· 11/6/1996

Buckley v. Gallo Sales Co.

Citations

  • 949 F. Supp. 737
  • 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 175
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 3627
  • 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3012
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18765
  • 1996 WL 718157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the 5 exclusive remedy provisions do not preclude employees from pursing discrimination claims under 6 FEHA
  • construing a motion to stay pending arbitration as a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thelton E. Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.