Buckingham v. Mabus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• review of PTA determination is limited to the administrative record and the arguments presented before the agency
• “‘hard and fast rule of administrative law’ that ‘issues not raised before an agency are waived and will not be considered by a court on review’”
• “[I]t is a ‘hard and fast rule of administrative law’ that ‘issues not raised before an agency are waived and will not be considered by a court on review.’”
• agency reasoning was sufficient under the APA when it “adequately addressed the substance of the argument . . . , even though it did not in the process enumerate every point made by [plaintiff] in support of that argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).