Skip to main content
· 9/6/2006

Buckeye Retirement Properties of Indiana, LLC v. Tauber (In Re Tauber)

Citations

  • 349 B.R. 540
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2151
  • 2006 WL 2563368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, for purposes of § 727(a)(5), “the -11- debtor does not need to justify the wisdom or prudence in the disposition of assets”
  • finding allegedly inaccurate statements immaterial when they “had no bearing on the outcome of these proceedings”
  • for purposes of § 727(a)(5), “the debtor does not need to justify the wisdom or prudence in the disposition of assets”
  • “The denial of a debtor’s dis- charge is akin to financial capital punishment [and] is reserved for the most egregious misconduct by a debtor.”
  • “The denial of a debtor's discharge is akin to financial capital punishment. It is reserved for the most egregious misconduct by a debtor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Philip Klingeberger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.