Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. Saffold
Citations
- 125 Miss. 407
- 87 So. 893
Syllabus
<p>Master asd Servant. Gleaning machine in motion, held ‘proximate cause of injury.</p> <p>Where a master has provided a perfectly safe contrivance by which machinery might be started or stopped at will, and an employee, who was in sole charge of the operation of the machinery, started it in motion, and then without necessity undertook to clean it while it was in motion, and as a consequence was injured, the act of the employee in selecting a highly dangerous method of performing a duty when a perfectly safe method was equally available was the proximate and sole cause of the injury.</p>
Judges: Cook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.