· 11/16/1925
Buckeye Coal & Railway Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.
Citations
- 269 U.S. 42
- 46 S. Ct. 61
- 70 L. Ed. 155
- 1925 U.S. LEXIS 763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
- holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
- holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
- holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
- holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant's noncompliance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.