Skip to main content
· 11/16/1925

Buckeye Coal & Railway Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.

Citations

  • 269 U.S. 42
  • 46 S. Ct. 61
  • 70 L. Ed. 155
  • 1925 U.S. LEXIS 763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
  • holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
  • holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
  • holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant’s noncompli- ance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction
  • holding that a nonparty injured by the defendant's noncompliance with an injunction could not enforce the injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.