Buckeridge Door Co. v. Chicago & Northeast Illinois District Council of Carpenters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that motions to compel filed after the close of discovery are almost always deemed untimely
• denying motion to compel brought on last day of discovery period
• “[A] line of sorts has been sketched by a series of decisions: motions to compel filed after the close of discovery are almost always deemed untimely.”
• “The mere filing of the motion does not automatically stay discovery”
• “Long before the motion to compel was filed, the plaintiffs were aware that they were not going to get any answers to interrogatories . . . . Thus, at any time over the eight-month period, the plaintiffs could have filed a [motion to compel].”
• “District courts enjoy extremely broad discretion in controlling discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).