Skip to main content
· 10/11/2018

Buck, Michael J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for-cause removal restrictions on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Director violated the separation of powers
  • holding that an agency’s structure violated the separation of powers because the director was only removable by the president for cause
  • holding that a for-cause restriction of the 4 President’s executive power to remove the CFPB’s single director violated the 5 separation of powers doctrine
  • concluding that “the CFPB’s leadership by a single independent Director violates the separate of powers” because it insulated the director from removal at will
  • holding that for-cause removal restrictions on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Director violated the separation of powers
  • holding that a for-cause restriction of the President’s executive power 24 to remove the CFPB’s single director violated the separation of powers doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.