· 10/11/2018
Buck, Michael J.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for-cause removal restrictions on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Director violated the separation of powers
- holding that an agency’s structure violated the separation of powers because the director was only removable by the president for cause
- holding that a for-cause restriction of the 4 President’s executive power to remove the CFPB’s single director violated the 5 separation of powers doctrine
- concluding that “the CFPB’s leadership by a single independent Director violates the separate of powers” because it insulated the director from removal at will
- holding that for-cause removal restrictions on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Director violated the separation of powers
- holding that a for-cause restriction of the President’s executive power 24 to remove the CFPB’s single director violated the separation of powers doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.