Skip to main content
· 6/12/1981

Buchholz v. Cam

Citations

  • 430 A.2d 1199
  • 288 Pa. Super. 33
  • 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • property in custodia legis is not subject to attachment until purpose for which Commonwealth holds it has been effectuated
  • property in custodia legis is not subject to attachment until purpose for which Commonwealth holds it has been effectuated
  • funds in the possession of Commonwealth and owing to individuals are held in custodia legis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Watkins, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.