D. Minnesota· 11/2/1973
Buchholtz v. Swift & Co.
Citations
- 62 F.R.D. 581
- 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2756
Judges: Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1982-02-24· cited 240×
- Summons v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-06-24· cited 47×
- International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-03-21· cited 36×
- Fox Chemical Co. v. Amsoil, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1978-03-01· cited 28×
- Carter v. JerniganSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-03-19· cited 27×
- Ario v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-17· cited 16×
- Howard v. Aluminum Workers International UnionFourth Circuit· 1978-12-26· cited 16×
- Butler v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaEighth Circuit· 1975-03-18· cited 14×
- Fogie v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1993-03-02· cited 10×
- Safran v. United Steelworkers of AmericaW.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-10-31· cited 10×
- Billy G. Butler v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of AmericaEighth Circuit· 1975-05-08· cited 9×
- David L. Howard v. Aluminum Workers International Union And Local 400Fourth Circuit· 1978-12-26· cited 8×
- Talley v. United States Postal ServiceD. Minnesota· 1982-02-18· cited 7×
- In re Fleetboston Financial Corp. Securities LitigationD. New Jersey· 2008-10-20· cited 7×
- Griffin v. American Motors Sales Corp.D. Minnesota· 1985-10-04· cited 4×
- Paoletti v. ZlimenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-09· cited 3×
- INT'L U. OF ELEC., ETC., WKRS. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-03-21
Cites
81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 5,431×
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court· 1967-02-27· cited 4,450×
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 2,816×
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 2,575×
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court· 1953-04-06· cited 1,048×
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 980×
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 629×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSecond Circuit· 1968-03-08· cited 609×
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielThird Circuit· 1970-06-08· cited 418×
- Esplin v. HirschiTenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 325×
- Dolgow v. AndersonE.D. New York· 1968-01-03· cited 312×
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-01-23· cited 207×
- Rosa M. Figueroa De Arroyo v. Sindicato De Trabajadores Packinghouse, Afl-Cio, and Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyFirst Circuit· 1970-04-17· cited 199×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSecond Circuit· 1973-05-01· cited 178×
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaS.D. New York· 1968-01-22· cited 172×
- Szot v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 165×
- Armour & Co. v. Local Union No. 186, United Packinghouse, Food & Allied WorkersSupreme Court· 1972-02-28· cited 129×
- Local Union No. 12, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardFifth Circuit· 1966-11-09· cited 114×
Other cases named Buchholtz v. Swift & Co.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.