Skip to main content
· 2/17/1982

Buchholtz v. Iowa Department of Public Instruction

Citations

  • 315 N.W.2d 789
  • 2 Educ. L. Rep. 848
  • 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding substantial compliance despite the mailed petition naming only one of the three closely related entities
  • finding substantial compliance when plaintiff mailed notice to wrong party, but respondent still received notice
  • finding substantial compliance despite the mailed petition naming only one of the three closely related entities
  • finding substantial compliance with service-by-mailing alternative where the agency received timely mailed notice but the petition contained a mistaken designation of the agency
  • \The [state] statutes are intended to make state and local educational programs eligible for federal funding under the [EHA.]\
  • “The [state] statutes are intended to make state and local educational programs eligible for federal funding under the [EHA.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Uhlenhopp, McCormick, Allbee, Larson, Schultz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.