Buchanan v. National Savings & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address the merits of a claim where the issue was not considered in the district court and remanding for such consideration
• “Because plaintiffs have mounted a facial challenge to the Act, they must show that, no matter how the Act is read, it punishes status and not conduct.”
• “[T]here is no doubt that the Act treats homosexuals and heterosexuals differently even though they have engaged in similar acts within a broad range.”
• “Deference to Congress in military matters of course does not mean that Congress operates free of all constitutional restraint when legislating in this area.”
• “This evidentiary use substantially furthers the government’s interest beeause ... there is a correlation between those who state that they are homosexual and those who engage in homosexual acts.”
• \This evidentiary use substantially furthers the government's interest because ... there is a correlation between those who state that they are homosexual and those who engage in homosexual acts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).