Supreme Court of Virginia· 3/10/1938
Buchanan v. Buchanan
Citations
- 170 Va. 458
- 197 S.E. 426
- 116 A.L.R. 688
- 1938 Va. LEXIS 202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The primary object of habeas corpus is to determine the legality of the restraint under which a person is held.\
- \The primary object of habeas corpus is to determine the legality of the restraint under which a person is held.\
- the court of chancery, as representing the parental and protecting power of the Commonwealth, has jurisdiction to determine controversies concerning the guardianship of a minor
- “The contract between mother and father ... is not binding upon a court, as to the custody of infants .... The custody and welfare of children are not the subject of barter.”
- only void judgments subject to collateral attack
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Habeas Corpus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Long v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1975-04-29· cited 148×
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court· 1962-12-10· cited 137×
- Robertson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1943-04-26· cited 121×
- Jones v. WillardSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-01-21· cited 84×
- Verrocchio v. VerrocchioCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-04-27· cited 52×
- Local 333B, United Marine Division v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1952-06-16· cited 47×
- Howarth v. NorthcottSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-03-04· cited 47×
- McClaugherty v. McClaughertySupreme Court of Virginia· 1942-09-09· cited 37×
- Laing v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1964-09-11· cited 36×
- Fortson v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1943-04-15· cited 36×
- Smyth v. MidgettSupreme Court of Virginia· 1958-01-20· cited 32×
- Hopkins v. YarbroughWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-11· cited 31×
- Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of Virginia· 1940-01-08· cited 26×
- Greeson v. GreesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1953-04-07· cited 22×
- Smyth v. HollandSupreme Court of Virginia· 1957-04-26· cited 21×
- State Ex Rel. Titus v. HayesWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1965-10-19· cited 19×
- Sheehan v. SheehanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1955-11-15· cited 19×
- Church v. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-04-08· cited 16×
- Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1952-02-11· cited 15×
- Hamel v. HamelCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-03-08· cited 14×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anthony v. KaseySupreme Court of Virginia· 1887-05-19· cited 78×
- Armstrong v. ObucinoIllinois Supreme Court· 1921-10-22· cited 62×
- Bray v. LandergrenSupreme Court of Virginia· 1934-01-11· cited 61×
- State ex rel. Sharpe v. BanksIndiana Supreme Court· 1865-11-15· cited 31×
- Eschner v. EschnerCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1926-02-25· cited 24×
- Coffee v. BlackSupreme Court of Virginia· 1866-11-18· cited 22×
- Merritt v. SwimleySupreme Court of Virginia· 1886-09-30· cited 21×
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1933-03-30· cited 21×
- Huke v. HukeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1891-03-24· cited 19×
- People ex rel. Klee v. KleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1922-06-30· cited 16×
- Hayes v. StraussSupreme Court of Virginia· 1928-09-20· cited 16×
- People ex rel. Prior v. PriorNew York Supreme Court· 1920-06-15· cited 14×
- Mathews v. WadeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1868-01-15· cited 12×
- Watson v. MoseSupreme Court of Virginia· 1936-01-16· cited 7×
- In re the Estate of VanderbiltNew York Surrogate's Court· 1934-12-15· cited 6×
- Lowrey v. LowreySupreme Court of Georgia· 1899-04-25· cited 3×
- Slater v. SlaterSupreme Court of Virginia· 1894-12-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.