Skip to main content
· 3/15/2007

Buchanan v. Ameristar Casino Vicksburg

Citations

  • 957 So. 2d 969
  • 2007 Miss. LEXIS 130
  • 2007 WL 764768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring three factors to pierce the corporate veil—some frustration of contractual expectations, the flagrant disregard of corporate formalities, and fraud or other equivalent misfeasance
  • “[Plaintiff] did not show any frustration of contractual expectations regarding the party to whom she looked for performance [because the plaintiff] had no contractual expectation regarding [the defendant corporation].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, C.J., Easley and Graves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.