Buchanan-Moore v. County of Milwaukee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[Plaintiffs’] complaint must allege facts suggesting that the County’s conduct was the proximate cause of [decedent’s] death; that is, [decedent] must have been a foreseeable victim of the county’s acts.”
• affirming dismissal of plaintiff’s claim where plaintiff failed to allege the causation prong of the state-created danger exception
• “Rule 12(c) permits a party to move for judgment after the complaint and answer have been filed by the parties.”
• “Rule 12(c) permits a party to move for judgment after the complaint and answer have been filed by the parties.”
• “when a state has custody over a person, it must protect him because no alternative avenues of aid exist.”
• “[A court] review[s] Rule 12(c) motions by employing the same standard that applies when reviewing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).