Buccinna v. Micheletti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding defendant who prevailed at trial was not entitled to counsel fees under CEPA because there was no finding that plaintiff's claim was \without basis in law or in fact\
• noting that appeals are from judgments, not reasons given by trial judge
• finding the standard for an award of fees under CEPA, N.J.S.A. 34:19-6, similar to the standard for the frivolous claim law, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1
• reviewing post- trial motion for costs and fees under CEPA
• discussing the general rule concerning costs of depositions and exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).